The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on General Aviation has announced it intends to investigate the way that airspace changes are processed by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) in the UK
The Parliamentary Group’s announcement comes in the wake of a controversial decision to grant controlled zones to a further large swathe of South East airspace near Farnborough.
You can read Pilot magazine’s official response to this airspace change proposal here.
The wide-ranging inquiry by parliamentarians will study the CAA’s current powers and make recommendations on how the law might be changed to address deficiencies in the current process.
In addition to making representations to ministers, MPs and Lords may also introduce legislation to change the current law.
The all-party group will invite stakeholders to submit evidence then hold hearings in the House of Commons as part of their Inquiry. With the full Terms of Reference to be published in due course, the report is expected to cover:
• What the overarching policy objective should be for lower-airspace
• Whether there is sufficient parliamentary and ministerial oversight of proposed and enacted airspace changes
• What measures should be in place to monitor and withdraw underutilised areas of controlled airspace
• Whether airspace change sponsors should make financial contributions in return for taking away airspace from other users – similar to so-called Section 106 provisions in national planning policy
Commenting on the CAA’s Controlled Airspace Change decision for Farnborough, Chair of the 170-strong All-Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation, Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP said: “We start from a position that says airspace belongs to everyone.
“We entirely accept that there will be cases for implementing Controlled Airspace, but are concerned the current procedure circumvents parliamentary and ministerial oversight; both in terms of policy direction and decision-making.
“The Farnborough decision impacts on a large number of other aviators, so should the sponsor be required to compensate other air users like the gliding community, who will now require Transponders to transit Class E airspace, for example.
“Furthermore, the CAA’s controversial decision on Farnborough airspace has raised another issue about where power lies to make such decisions. Currently the CAA quite literally writes its own rules using Civil Aviation Publications, or CAPs, and then judges the outcome of any applications.”
“The all-party group represents 170 parliamentarians who believe that it is time to have a look at the laws which govern how our airspace is carved up. Once our investigation and report is concluded, we will present our findings to Government ministers and potentially look to our members to sponsor legislation to amend the lower airspace policy and the decision-making process in the UK.”
Parliamentary Chair of the APPG’s Airspace Working Group, Lord Kirkhope commented: “The APPG regards this airspace change as a test case. Currently the CAA and Airspace Change Sponsors (usually airports) make changes under a set of rules devised by the CAA, with little Ministerial guidance – nowadays described in the document CAP1616.
“However, as MPs and Lords we are clear that the right to govern how our airspace is divided up ultimately rests with Parliament. We will therefore watch the implementation of this significant airspace change very carefully.”
